Showing posts with label note. Show all posts
Showing posts with label note. Show all posts

2016-01-26

Washing Away Constipation With Water

Constipation can be a frustrating and uncomfortable problem. Part of the discomfort associated with constipation can involve discussing your problem with a healthcare professional such as your doctor. This can lead people to seek to try self-care solutions to their constipation problems.

ConstipationTwo of the more common strategies that people employ to address the problem of constipation are changes in their diet or the use of over-the-counter medications.

Adding considerable amounts of dietary fiber to one’s diet can prove to be an effective way to improve the way that one’s digestive system functions.

Using over-the-counter medications such as laxatives and stool softeners can also be an effective way to provide at least temporary relief to the problematic symptoms of constipation. Over-the-counter medications, if used in excess or over longer periods of time, however, can lose their effectiveness and can also hinder the way that the digestive system works to eliminate stools.

One cause of constipation that can be overlooked in all this is dehydration. Here’s why. The food that you eat is initially processed in the small intestine. From there it makes its way to the large intestine, which consists of the colon and the rectum. A lack of water can impede the progress of your food through this tubular system. The lining of the large intestine is designed to soak up water from waste matter that passes through the intestine. If the waste matter doesn’t contain enough water, hard stools are formed that are difficult to pass through the rectum. If that sounds a lot like a description of constipation you are correct, it is. It also serves to suggest that more water can help to solve a constipation problem.

Preventing dehydration

As described above your body needs more water, it doesn’t need to lose water by way of dehydration. An effective way to prevent excessive dehydration is to drink more water. It’s really that simple. It is especially important to drink more water during hot weather or after periods of strenuous exercise. It is also necessary to carefully monitor the amount of fluid that you’re body needs and the amount of fluid you are providing to it.

Simply drinking more water will not provide a complete cure for constipation. However, additional fluids in the digestive system will help to keep stools soft and facilitate digestive processes such as bowel movements.

How much water do I really need?

Rough estimates indicate that women typically consume about 90 ounces of water per day from a variety of sources and men take in about 125 ounces on a daily basis. If you are of an average size you may be able to use those numbers as some kind of bare minimum.

You don’t however get all your water by drinking it. Drinking about four extra glasses of water a day might be a good way to test how adding additional amounts of water to your daily intake effects the symptoms of constipation. There’s something to be said for the old saying “listen to your body”.

People who have been advised by their doctor to limit their consumption of fluids will have to discuss these recommendations with their doctor.

2016-01-24

Constipation Symptoms

Constipation Symptoms

The symptoms of constipation are fairly simple to describe. In a real sense, constipation involves one overriding symptom: the inability of the bowels to function normally. Constipation might just as well be called bowel dysfunction. Bowel movement frequency can vary from person to person. If more than three days pass without a bowel movement, constipation is considered to be occurring. Difficulty and pain in passing a stool is often described as constipation as well. Excessive straining or feelings of incomplete emptying are also considered to be correctly described as constipation.

Constipation can more correctly be described as a symptom of many different diseases instead of as a disease in and of itself. Aside from the inability to have a bold movement the following symbol symptoms may accompany that inability: abdominal bloating cramping are paying; decrease in appetite or overall feelings of lethargy and fatigue. The following symptoms may accompany more serious cases of constipation.

• A swollen abdomen or abdominal pain

• Pain in other areas close to the bowel

• Vomiting

• Extreme nausea

Symptoms and Symptoms

It may be more useful to discuss what constipation is a symptom of as opposed to what the symptoms of constipation are. The following list can get us started in that direction.

Constipation can indicate that the following serious medical and psychological conditions need to be investigated as its causes:

• Stress

• Hemorrhoids

• Hypothyroidism

• Neurological conditions such as Parkinson’s disease or multiple sclerosis

• Depression

• Eating disorders

• Irritable colon

• Pregnancy

• Colon cancer

Each of the items that make up the list above may need to be diagnosed and treated separately from the constipation that they are associated with. It is true that a relatively small number of patients with constipation actually have serious medical problems that need to be addressed in addition to the problem of constipation.

Diagnostic techniques associated with constipation can include the following:

Is a hormonal imbalance is suspected blood tests may need to be performed

But barium-based studies may be required if obstructions of the colon is suspected

A colonoscopy can also be used to look for obstructions in the colon

Controlling the symptoms associated with concentration can be relatively easy and performed by persons suffering from the condition itself. These include:

Drinking plenty of fluids, especially warm water early in the day

Consuming fruits and vegetables on a regular basis

Adding fiber in the form of bran or prunes to the diet

Mild stool softener as are appropriate if not used excessively

Laxatives may be of benefit if used in a judicious manner

Contraindications

If constipation is chronic and fails to respond to treatment in a timely manner the following medications may need to be curtailed or substituted for:

• Narcotics used to treat pain and other medications used for pain

• Antacids that contain aluminum

• Anti-depressant drugs

• Iron supplements

• Anti-spasmodic drugs

• Antihypertensive calcium channel blockers

If you are suffering from constipation, you should make an appointment to see your doctor before halting the use of any of the medications mentioned in the list above.

2016-01-23

Fight Night On The Drive

Fight Night On The Drive

Last night I watched Lennox Lewis destroy Mike Tyson. I watched it on the multiple TV screens at the Roma Cafe on the corner of Commercial Drive and Grant, surrounded by hundreds of my neighbours and street acquaintances, shouting and cheering and spilling beer. It's the only place I'd think of to go when a big fight is on, even though I'm sure every other Italian bar along the street (with names for just about every region -- Abruzzo, Calabria, Napoli) and the Portuguese Club and the Ethiopian places above 3rd are all tuned in.

We live on The Drive. According to the Vancouver Tourist Bureau (and the local Post Office), this is "Little Italy" although, for the decade or more I've lived here I've never heard anyone call it that. We just call it East Van, or The Drive. Don't get me wrong, the Tourist Bureau isn't really inaccurate, just behind the times. Immediately after the war a heavy influx of Italian immigrants created a vibrant ethnic society that still flourishes here. Many of the restaurants and bars and retail enterprises on Commerical Drive are still Italian; Italian is heard daily and loudly on the streets, and Victoria Park around the corner is a hotbed of bocce and Italian card games.

But that doesn't tell half the story. The neighbourhood has been enriched and layered over the years with every group of new immigrants to Vancouver. The Chinese have always been the majority non-white population in the neighbourhood, and their public presence is maintained today with vibrant vegetable markets and pungent pastry stores. In addition, East Indians and multi-national Latinos and Eastern Europeans and Africans have all opened restauarants and stores on The Drive and their languages and smells and rhythms punctuate our every walk down the street. Last night, everyone was out and about.

By the time I arrived at 6:30 the Roma was already full. With a ten dollar cover and beer at five bucks a pop, the owners were about to make another killing. Not that they looked too happy right then. The owners, the barmen, the waiters and the odd little guy who always collects the cover and stamps your hand, they all looked dead tired. Italy's World Cup soccer game against Croatia hadn't finished until the early hours of the morning; and Italy's shock 2-1 defeat didn't help make the sacrifice of sleep more worthwhile for them. The bar was busy but luckily I was by myself and single seats at well-positioned tables were still available. I grabbed two beers and sat down.

To say the bar was full when I arrived is really to misrepresent the ingenuity of the Roma's owners and patrons. By the time the big fight started, more than twice as many had been crammed in. I've paid for a lot of fights at the Roma over the years. This time the crowd seemed noticeably younger and generally less Italian than usual. Which didn't stop the lively trade in pizza slices (some say the worst on The Drive) and sizzling hot Italian sausages in buns. I tuned in to a half dozen conversations in a half dozen different languages, and then tuned into the fights on TV.

No matter the business behind it, boxing is honest money. Two consenting and generally eager adults agree to pit themselves against each other in a purely physical contest; and both get paid according to how many people are willing to pay to see them. The first two fighters had dot.com addresses painted across their backs ("Wallstreet.com" beat up "Golden Palace.com".) Why not -- it's honest cash in the bank for otherwise poor black men with few other opportunities to escape their poverty.

In the second fight, the champion probably didn't need the money so he fought bare-backed, while Golden Palace.com had once again purchased the back of the challenger. Unfortunately for their marketing strategy, the challenger's back graced the canvas more than it did the big screen. It was over before the second bell in a very another impressive performance by Manny The Destroyer Pacquiao, the best pound-for-pound puncher in the business today. I hope he now moves up from 122 to 126 where he can make some real money.

The undercard -- those fights used to generate interest before the main event -- was surprisngly lacklustre and finished early. Both Lewis and Tyson had clauses about not appearing before a certain time (ten Central, I think) meaning that the network was left with a huge amount of empty space to fill. So we were treated to a couple of rich black guys (Samuel L. Jackson, Cuba Gooding jr) hamming it up with another rich black guy, presenter James Brown, about how the brothers were gonna put a whipping on each other. It was kind of embarrassing. They were followed on by LL Cool J who was polite and articulate and who made the previous clowns look like mugs.

Still anxious to fill in time, Smokin' Joe Frazier was called in. In the general view of the bar around me, he came across as a punch-drunk, or just drunk or stoned, old man. But I watched him closely and he followed every question carefully and his answers were always appropriate even though they didn't follow the arc the interviewer would have expected. It was as if Joe still had an articulate mind trapped inside his wrecked body. His difficulty of speech is considerably less than Ali's, say, but detailed muscle control doesn't seem to be Smokin' Joe's greatest asset right now.

Finally, Evander Hollyfield -- who always deserved his Real Deal nickname -- came on to call the fight for Tyson ("because he'll take more chances than I was willing to") and then the time had arrived.

The entrances were considerably tamer than we have become used to for these events. Boxing's heavyweight champions are the celebrities of a celebrity-saturated planet. No individual in the world makes as much money for a single event as the heavyweight champion of the world. No-one. Not Tom Hanks not Bono not Paul McCartney not Michael Jordan not Michael Schumacher. Not even Tiger Woods comes close to the singular earning power of these athletes. Usualy, their entrances to arenas are occasions for splendour and extravagance. Not last night. Security personnel allowed only 6 people to each corner (a move that seemed to surprise both camps) and the music for each boxer was unsurprising and low key.

There were, however, theatrics in the ring where the ring was split in two by a line of a dozen burly security guards. The hype for the fight had the two fighters eager to tear each other apart at the slightest opportunity. The Commission had decided to make sure that only happened after the bell had sounded. To be honest, though, both boxers looked calm and unperturbed by events around them, and neither showed any inclination to break the rules. And then, at last, it began. I felt myself drawn to the edge of my seat and I could sense the same expectation across the room.

The first round was even, with Tyson the aggressor. That was it for the fight really. From round two it was clear that Iron Mike had no answer to the champion's extraordinarily long and extraordinarily hard straight jab that crushed its way remorselessly into Tyson's face over and over again. The crowd at Roma had been overwhelmingly in favour of Tyson before the bell began. By the third round they were shouting at their man to make a fight of it. By round four it was clear Tyson was dead meat, a bully made to look inelegantly amateurish, and Lewis was just waiting for the right opportunity. When it came in round seven it was a relief to everyone. The real Champion had pounded the Animal into chump steak.

In the close warm evening it was still almost light, and more people outside than in were trying to see the TV screens through the closed blinds and from odd elevated angles. The smell of pizza and marijuana flooded my nose. Crowds poured from every storefront, laughing, talking, music everywhere; the sounds of carnival. It's gonna be a great summer on the Drive. – David Chun

Kahlo Carr O'Keefe

Kahlo Carr O'Keefe

Today we visited the Vancouver Art Gallery for this summer's major exhibition, Carr O'Keefe Kahlo which looks for thematic similarities between three women considered to be among North America's premier artists; Frida Kahlo of Mexico, Emily Carr of Canada, and Georgia O'Keefe of the United States.

I like the idea of Frida Kahlo.

A committed Marxist, friend of Trotsky, lover of Diego Rivera one of the great socialist painters of the age, and she herself an equally famous painter with the sort of bright palette that usually inspires me. But I saw a lot of Kahlo today, and confess I don't care for her work in bulk. Her endless self-portraits in essentially similar settings seem more like pandering self-obsession than either socialist or indigenous consciousness. While I enjoy her palette, I don't enjoy her style of painting. In fact, much of it rather annoyed me; or, rather, perhaps it is the fame of these banal works that annoys me.

Frida Kahlo

The subtitle of the exhibition, the theme that is I suppose being suggested as the link between these women is "Places of Their Own." According to the exhibition catalogue, "their work gives form to a mythos of North America, linking region and nationality to larger forces at work in Western consciousness." I can see how this works with Carr and O'Keefe; but with Frida Kahlo I always have the impression that she is donning those dresses for effect, to show off herself rather than the culture expressed in the clothes. And her work seems so mannered compared to the liquid freedoms enjoyed by Emily Carr and Georgia O'Keefe.

I did not buy the book ($65, I think) that accompanies the exhibit, and it is probably unfair of me to criticize after a single viewing a thesis that the curator no doubt spends a couple of hundred pages defending. Still, in all, other than the gender and period, I did not feel a link between Kahlo and the others.

The Vancouver Art Gallery is home to the Permanent Collection of Emily Carr. There are regular special exhibits of her work (one is going on right now, for example, coincident with but unconnected to the joint exhibition) and she is always available to us. It was especially interesting, therefore, to see a selection of her works deliberately set within a wider framework.

Emily Carr

I have to confess that I have not been a huge fan of Emily Carr in the past. A lot of that has to do with the particular blue-green palette that features in most of her works. At this exhibition, however, I seemed able to get past that and see the extraordinary organic life that almost vibrates through many of these paintings. At least fifty percent of the canvasses still don't work for me, but I suspect that I will soon revisit the Permanent Collection, make myself better acquainted with them, and that I will be drawn closer to them after this experience.

And then there's Georgia O'Keefe.

It is a long time since I have seen more than an isolated O'Keefe. However, over the years, I've managed to see a lot of them, one at a time, and my view of her work has probably been influenced by the discontinuity of experience. I would tend to love one piece and then dislike the next piece or two, and love the next again. At this exhibition, there is a wide range of O'Keefe's paintings and I was at last able to put each work in perspective. And she is great!

O'Keefe

I still don't really care for skulls and such but, for instance, her explorations in that area in the Pelvis Series are magnificent. Like Emily Carr, she has the ability to create landscapes that are more like animated bodies than stolid rocks and trees. I fell completely in love with her Patio Series and her pictures of adobe churches: somehow she makes the flat planes sing with radiant joy. Magical stuff.

So, all in all, a very worthwhile exhibit. It enlightened my view of O'Keefe, brought me home to Emily Carr, and at least allowed me to make a personal judgement on Frida Kahlo's paintings. The curator's work was well done. – (David Chun)

What's your best time?

What's your best time?

a friend remarked that it's always funny when people talk about it, because they invariably say something like "oh yeah, im not that hardcore...it takes me [x] minutes". when really, [x] is something super good like 40-45 minutes. but people don't want to say straight out that they think they have a good finish time because the person they're talking to could be even more hardcore.

i think vancouver has a weird dynamic with that stuff. it seems like everyone really likes competing with each other to see who is the most hardc0re at outdoor activities. you see people racing on the seawall or going a bit faster when they see you approach them in demo forest...even on the grouse grind, they have tags that time you and post your best time on an electronic board at the top, to see where you rank in terms of everyone else.

i'll just come out and say it: my best time for the grind is 64 minutes. i've only done it twice though and i really want to break an hour next time. 64 minutes isn't hardc0re, but i think it's respectable. we passed 21 people and 3 people passed us. – (David Chun)

------------------

Hey - What a great workout! Did the Grind on July 5th while on a business trip layover in Vancouver and what a rush. The views were great and after seeing the peaks called the Lions in the distance, I went over to Lion's Bay and hiked and climbed up to the West Lion as well. Couldn't quite summit but got as far as the second set of fixed ropes and chickened out! Truth is, the Lion was a bit cold for my t-shirt clad and tired body to safely attempt. Vancouver is a great city and I'm looking forward to doing the Grouse again.

------------------

I just finished it for the first time today. I very nice workout. Did it in 47 minutes (at 43 years old). Would like to get the time down to 43 to see is I can match my age *grin*. The amazing thing was there was a woman about 50-55 years old that did it faster than me... and looked like it as an easy pace for her... truly inspiring (I, in comparison, was soaked in sweat).

-----------------

I keep begging my hiking group to do the grind, but they keep insisting that there's lots of prettier and/or more hardcore hikes on the north shore mountains that aren't as busy and crowded.

I think i'm just gonna stick with the baden powell trail for the time being. :)

-----------------

I just finished the Grouse Grind today with my friend. We like it a lot. This is my 3rd time. I realize it's much easiler to hike on a rainy day than on a sunny day. This way you won't run out of breath.

Gillian Wearing videos

Gillian Wearing videos

I managed to get to the Vancouver Art Gallery today, but didn't have enough time to experience the whole thing, so I limited myself to the O'Keeffe paintings, the Gillian Wearing videos, as well as a portion of the permanent collection at VAG (the Paul Wong collection seemed like it would be a little audacious for my tastes, and the Emily Carr collection looked like it deserved a lengthier visit to the gallery).

The Wearing videos were touching, to say the least. Prelude is simply four minutes of video of a woman named Lindsey, who impressed Wearing much during her short visit that she wanted to do a more in depth study, only to find out that she passed away of cirrhosis of the liver before they could start anything. It is slow-motion footage of Lindsey with a voice-over by her twin sister, and the video shows a woman going from appearing incredibly charismatic to disintegrating into outburst and then weariness.

The 23-minute-long Drunk is footage on three 'screens' of South London drinkers in the throws of inebriation. While it is at times humourous, it is really an exposé of the dark side of alcohol, of the violence and depravity that it can cause. Apparently actors were used as well as actual drunks, and we are given no indication of who is who (although I have my suspicions).

Much of the discomfort the video intentionally provokes comes not only from the horrible mood most of the participants are in, but also in the fact that the camera stays focussed on a subject for so long. In our movies and our TV, we're used to 10 seconds (and less) of footage on a person before the scene or focus changes. Here the camera stays as if ithey were long takes, watching as a drunk woman (who is fairly well dressed as well as middle-age) fall over while, simultaneously on another screen, we see the full process of a drunkard falling asleep in his own drool. At one point one of the Vancouver Art Gallery security guards-slash-information officers, on his own volition, came in and gave a running commentary of the "fight" scene, almost ruining its poignancy.

At some point I'll return to take in the Carr exhibits, but the Wearing videos were well worth the student admission I paid despite being already graduated. – (David Chun)

What does it mean to jip someone?

What does it mean to jip someone?

 
I am going to go on about this a bit, as it is probably the question I am asked more frequently than any other. Jip is not short for anything, and is my legal name, yes. I was named after my father, who was named after his father, who was named after my great-grandfather's foreman at Pruden Coal & Coke Company.

His name was Jip Manring and was a favored "uncle" of my great-grandfather's family. I suspect it may have been his nickname and possibly based on someone's initials, though I have no hard evidence of that.

Jip was a common name in England in the late 1800's. But for canines. Ha! The stories Dr. Doolittle and The Dollmaker both have dogs named Jip. I've seen grade school reading primers with dogs named Jip instead of Spot. I'm told that in today's England the word "jip" is used in describing something acting up, as in "My arm is full of jip!" if it has a twitch. And no, though you may think you are the first to speak it, "So, are you going to gyp me?" is a quip I have heard hundreds of times. The word gyp comes from the word gypsy.

Even after seeing it in print, many people insist on changing my name, evidently thinking I have spoken or written my own name wrong. Old Mainers call me Jeb. The sailboat crowd call me Jib. The average person often calls me Jim. I've heard Kip on many occasions. People from the Midwest call me Chip. My name is Jip, thank you. Jip Manring Pruden. – (David Chun)

to jip someone - :)